What Tinubu’s sacked ministers failed to do
The real reason President Bola Tinubu sacked some of his ministers on Wednesday has been revealed, even if unknowingly.
Special adviser to the president on information and strategy, Bayo Onanuga, tried to justify the sacking on lack of performance by the affected ministers, but inadvertently exposed the more important reason behind the decision.
Lack of publicity
According to him, they were relieved because they failed to failed to project the government to the world in an “appropriate way.”
Onanuga said “…the perception outside there by the people is that the people feel that the government is not performing, and the government believes that the government is performing, but the ministers were not going out to really project government the appropriate way.”
This suggests that the president had expected every member of his cabinet to engage in publicizing the activities of his ministry and that of the government, explaining to Nigerians why certain decision were taken and the expected benefits therefrom.
READ ALSO: FULL TEXT: President Tinubu’s speech on Nigeria’s 64th Independence Day
To buttress this, Onanuga said the ministers’ dismissals did not necessarily mean that the ministers were not meeting Tinubu’s expectations.
“But the expectation of the public. Some weeks ago, at the cabinet meeting, the President actually challenged the ministers to go out and tell Nigerians what they have been doing for the past one year or so…”
Role of Nigerians
Onanuga went ahead to explain the recent sacking was based on Nigerians’ scorecard and empirical facts, adding that the special adviser to the president on policy and coordination, Hadiza Bala Usman, played a huge role in the decision.
Tinubu on Wednesday relieved Barr. Uju-Ken Ohanenye, former Minister of Women Affairs, Lola Ade-John, his counterparts ministry of Tourism, Prof. Tahir Mamman (SAN) who headed the Education ministry, Abdullahi Muhammad Gwarzo, Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development and Dr. Jamila Bio Ibrahim, previously the Minister of Youth Development of their portfolios.
In an interview on ARISE TV, Onanuga said Tinubu acted on Nigerians’ perception.
According to him, Bala Usman was assigned to oversee a performance appraisal, which involved gathering public feedback on the ministers’ work.
The presidential aide further defended Tinubu’s decision to appoint seven new ministers to his cabinet.
He said the Nigerian government needs a lot of hands to tackle the problem that the country is facing.
He said, “When the ministers were sworn in, the President actually told them that as the president, he has the power to hire and fire, and that he would not hesitate to remove ministers who could not perform.
“There was a retreat in October last year where he also repeated the same warning about his plan to always try to rejig his cabinet in case some are not performing well.
Hadiza Bala Usman’s influence
“It was not just something that was done whimsically, I think Hadiza Bala Usman, Special Adviser on Policy and Coordination in fact brought technology into it by asking Nigerians to score the minister. So, whoever was removed was based on some empirical facts and their public perception. Nigerians actually did the scorecard and the President acted on the results.”
